<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Florida Appeals Court to FOX News: It is OK to lie!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://top-frog.com/2004/11/11/media_ok_to_lie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://top-frog.com/2004/11/11/media_ok_to_lie/</link>
	<description>Polluting the internet since 2004</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:32:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alden</title>
		<link>http://top-frog.com/2004/11/11/media_ok_to_lie/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Alden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://top-frog.com/?p=15#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Why do they bother interviewing people then since they can just pull this shit out of their asses? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do they bother interviewing people then since they can just pull this shit out of their asses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawn</title>
		<link>http://top-frog.com/2004/11/11/media_ok_to_lie/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://top-frog.com/?p=15#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I imagine that it can be because of a few factors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interviews, wether crap or legitimate, offer credibility to the story. Hearing the info from more than one source and if those sources have important sounding titles can have a positive impact on credibility.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They can also have a lot of things that can be taken out of context for the benefit or to the detriment of the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine that it can be because of a few factors.</p>
<p>Interviews, wether crap or legitimate, offer credibility to the story. Hearing the info from more than one source and if those sources have important sounding titles can have a positive impact on credibility.</p>
<p>They can also have a lot of things that can be taken out of context for the benefit or to the detriment of the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>